Xfce vs lxde reddit. When GNOME 2 came out, Xfce was regarded as the most lightweight option. Been using xfce on latest Refracta 64bit system and I reckon xfce uses less ram am I right or do you think otherwise ?? Loading Loading Click to continue It has a wide range of built-in applications, which are designed to integrate seamlessly with the desktop environment. com Sort by: Best I think for Xfce, I used “xfce4”, kde was “kde-plasma-desktop”, gnome was “gnome-core”, lxde was just “lxde”, open box was “openbox”, enlightenment was “enlightenment”. Side-by-side analysis of features, pricing, pros and cons to help you choose the best option for your needs. For the the true Mint experience, I like Cinnamon. LXQt (Previously Known as LXDE) LXDE was considered as one of the lightest desktops environment. If you prefer an alternative desktop environment such as Xfce, Cinnamon or MATE you can download a Fedora Spin for your preferred desktop environment and use that to install Fedora, pre-configured for the desktop environment of your choice. LXDE looks more basic compared to Xfce. However, GNOME 3 has added and modified many things since GNOME 2, and now the gap between GNOME 2 and Xfce looks very small. In an effort to standardize, we will be using LXLE to represent LXDE and Xubuntuto represent XFCE. It varies though a bit depending on the distro as some dont use SystemD and run a bit lighter. You might like distros that use one of the other DEs as it's default better than or as much as Mint. Though I personally prefer Xfce, I have had a good experience with LXDE, as well. I had AntergOS w/ KDE on my mom's X230 and it ran really well. That being said, Xfce is far more stable and mature; Lxqt is young and seeing a lot of work, which is great, but certainly makes it a moving target and opens the door for more issues. I would classify LXDE and LXQt as light to middle weight and possibly slightly lighter than XFCE with a W95 vibe. Community Many companies making single-board computers use LXDE as their desktop ItsRetix43 LXDE vs XFCE: Which Is the Better Lightweight Desktop Environment? maketecheasier. on the other handside the Lxqt is also good but it has less features although it is little bit lighter and snappier my friends keeps on telling. Manjaro tends to favor this because it's a rolling release, so it keeps the UI and Desktop stable while updating everything else. Compare Xfce vs LXDE and 11 other options side by side to learn "What are the best *nix desktop environments not using systemd?" 17 votes, 39 comments. XFCE: built to be modular, configurable and stable. Kde is getting better these days. Hey, so I have this old laptop it has a bad CPU and everything what should I use Xfce or KDE since people say KDE uses as ram… I never really saw the point of LXDE. Modular LXDE is completely modular, take parts out or add them back, or even use a component without LXDE! Familiar LXDE comes with a classic user experience so you can get started right away. Thanks for the laugh of the day :D. The real problem will be the applications you run. Desktop environment for all Features Lightweight LXDE runs anywhere, from a Raspberry Pi to a junkyard computer. Confused with the available choices of Cinnamon, MATE and Xfce variants in Linux Mint? Let me help you with which Linux Mint version should you use. Xubuntu) for an old Asus EEE PC Dear all, My wife's old Asus EEE PC (700 series) is really slow now (it's still running XP) and because she has come to love this thing so much. LXDE vs. LXQt vs Xfce: Which is better? 1: Customizability Intel Graphics On Ubuntu: GNOME vs. They have their own window managers and file managers, and many components can be installed separately from each other. LXDE phoronix. XFCE actually is not much lighter (if any) than KDE but much less configurable/clunky (frankly, I'm not sure why anyone uses XFCE anymore except due to dated rep for being a lightweight king). LXQt vs Xfce: Which is better? 1: Customizability Loading Loading Click to continue Actually I used Lxqt because I found it to be faster than Xfce, I based this of online data comparing the two and Xfce vs Lxqt's predicessor: Lxde ( which is probably lighter than Lxqt). But to take an example Xfce uses it's own window manager, xfwm, while LXDE/LXQt does not have a window manager on their own, instead they use the OpenBox window manager, but in both you could use another window manager. [LXDE vs XFCE vs KDE vs GNOME], [Linux vs BSD], [vi vs emacs], not to mention the distro wars Why do we need so many alternatives? I understand that there are advantages to having alternatives, that not everyone has the same needs and that today's star product can become tomorrow's failure. Didn't include Deepin, Pantheon, Budgie or Enlightenment due to lack of experience with them. LXDE and XFCE are two of the most popular lightweight desktop environments for Linux. Comparison of the best lightweight Linux desktop environments. If you have equipment with 4GB RAM, LXQT, LXDE or IceWM will be much lighter Compare Xfce vs LXDE and 20 other options side by side to learn "What are the best UNIX-like desktop environments for developers?" Which one to choose? some of my friends also told me that Xfce is most polished and has more features than other two. LXDE is usually agreed to be the lighter of the two, but there can be differences depending on the distro and XFCE has some niceties like the unified settings manager that could make it a better choice. XFCE has been around since forever and is still very light weight. Versions takes years to come out and this creates a very long term stable setup for users. If you run a pig like firefox you will have a baaaaad time. The primary difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+. MATE: Old Gnome, keeping Gnome alive as a more traditional desktop One article says LXQT and LXDE is faster than XFCE while another one says this isn't true as it depends on what programs you use. All are about the same. KDE vs. With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. XFCE is a little more flexible and feature rich and can be, if desired, be made to resemble W7, which some people still love. Yes that XFCE has just more options to choose like menu more panel plugins etc. You can use what ever you want on X230, it's one of a beast machine. Xfce vs. As someone already pointed out: XFCE > LXDE. Xfce LXQt and LXDE are lighter than Xfce, but that's only one part of the story. true Most resource intensive: Gnome (although improving a lot currently) Heavy resource usage, but not as bad as Gnome (more or less in order from heaviest to lightest): Cinnamon, Plasma, XfCE, Mate Very lightweight: LXQT Extremely light: Trinity Didn't include LXDE due to being essentially unmaintained. Which light-resource desktop environment is better: Xfce, Lxqt, or Lxde? And what's the most light-on-resource Linux that can be paired with it? Debian? There is no better, just different. before we toss it, I thought I would try a last effort of saving it using Linux. Also (at least on the Arch repo with everything included) the Xfce package is 41mibs vs Lxqt's 23 mibs. If you like Xfce or MATE, they are excellent DE's, but they are available with many distros. I still use devices with 1GB of RAM, and LXDE is good, LXQt is good too, Xfce depends a little with the version (newer versions using GTK3 of course are heavier; why I don't use MATE anymore with old devices as it ported to GTK3 much earlier). It doesn’t support as many features as Cinnamon but it’s lighter on resource usage. Xfce even after closing apps, it sticks to resources. Unless you really do need to count every megabyte, just use XFCE. Unfortunately, when I tried LXQT, I was plagued with stability, workflow, and memory issues. Linux Mint is an elegant, easy to use, up to date and comfortable desktop operating system. Learn which is better between LXDE vs XFCE today. You can run XFCE on Raspberry Pi OS (Raspbian), you might be thinking about the PIXEL desktop which is a modified version of LXDE and is the default desktop on Pi OS. What would you pick? Eight desktop environments and one Window manager The online installation allows you to choose Xfce, Plasma, Gnome, Mate, Cinnamon, Budgie, lxQT, lxDE, and i3-wm, but there’s more… Lxqt is probably slightly more lightweight due to its LXDE roots. com Compare Xfce vs LXDE. So, for the convenience of our readers, we’re comparing two popular desktop environments, LXQt Vs Xfce. Unity vs. TDE is definitely the lightest resource wise followed by LXDE,LXQT and XFCE. 感想 概ね想像通りの結果となった。 Xfceについては思ったよりメモリ使用量が多い印象を受けるが、EndeavourOSデフォルトのXfce環境が（透過が有効だったりと）割とグラフィカルだったので、本来はもう少し軽量かもしれない。 It has a wide range of built-in applications, which are designed to integrate seamlessly with the desktop environment. Xfce and LXQt are, in effect, collections of standalone programs packaged together. LXDE is the last resort on ultra-low-end old computers. LXDE (or Lubuntu) on the other hand is a newer DE, not that polished as Xfce, it takes several apps from Ubuntu and Xubuntu instead of having it's own equivalent (for example notifications, power manager, disk manager, and window manager (Openbox)). . From Xfce's perfect balance to LXDE's extreme efficiency and MATE's polished traditional interface, we cover everything you need to know to make the right choice for your machine. Discover the key differences between XFCE and LXQt, two of the most popular lightweight Linux desktop environments, to find the best fit Lxqt is probably slightly more lightweight due to its LXDE roots. If you have equipment with 4GB RAM, LXQT, LXDE or IceWM will be much lighter Download New Features Release Notes Light, simple, efficient Xfce Edition Xfce is a lightweight desktop environment. They’re also both based on Ubuntu, so there is little difference in the underlying system itself. As compared to Xfce, MATE is a bit glossier. You’ll be confused and wish to return to whatever we had previously if we walk through several Linux forums looking for the finest desktop. So try opening and closing programs and check resources after that. XFCE and LXDE/LXQt amazing environments and in the video, I will cover many of the differences Why do people install openbox on xfce (rather than just using lxde)? I've heard that xfce is a lightweight desktop environment, but for underlying window manager, many users replace the default xfwm with openbox. Xfce has gained a reputation for its ability to consume fewer system resources, making it a great option for computers with older hardware or limited resources. Xfce (Lubuntu vs. LXQt/LXDE vs. Each one has it's own fans that will praise one and reject others. The 2GB RAM will suck if using a browser much. Whether you are a newbie or a veteran, this is the best way to use vanilla Xfce desktop on a distribution. LXQt was previously known as LXDE; therefore, this may also be regarded as an LXDE vs Xfce comparison. Xfce on Debian possesses vast software choices and an efficient experience, making the pair very formidable. KDE is lighter weight and more configurable and more Windows-like than Gnome. Considering how much progress GNOME and KDE have made, using XFCE does not make much sense if we want "lightness" I really like XFCE (especially Thunar) and I've been using it for a long time, but I definitely wouldn't say it's light It's great, but definitely not light. LXDE and XFCE are two of the top Linux desktop environments out there, between them offering sleek UIs, customizability and the kind of desktop elegance that every Linux user wants. We compare the five leading Linux desktop environments, including KDE, Gnome and Cinnamon, in a 7-round face-off to help you find the one that’s right for you. KDE and XFCE are two impressive desktop environments known for their resource efficiency and performance. They take away a lot of the inconsistent things about their respective DEs, and it makes it easier to focus on the parts that matter. If you prefer GTK+, you're better off using Xfce. tiobn, hoos, yj0b9p, qgu59t, cxoowa, 3on0, vd29, h1oad, i6kaid, 0ahlc,